Deficiency Payment in 3rd District of Indiana (Rep. Jim Banks), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,427
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in 3rd District of Indiana (Rep. Jim Banks) totaled $2,693,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Bacon Bros Farms | New Haven, IN 46774 | $16,541 |
22 | Knotek Farms Inc | Fremont, IN 46737 | $16,036 |
23 | Kenneth E Parker | Pleasant Lake, IN 46779 | $15,976 |
24 | Bowman & Bowman Farms Inc | Waterloo, IN 46793 | $15,494 |
25 | Coomer Bros | New Haven, IN 46774 | $14,902 |
26 | Norman Thorp | Pioneer, OH 43554 | $14,812 |
27 | Marvin & Phyllis Walker | Waterloo, IN 46793 | $14,714 |
28 | Ivan Buckmaster & Sons Inc | Ashley, IN 46705 | $14,343 |
29 | Roger Rekeweg | Woodburn, IN 46797 | $14,250 |
30 | Greg Parr | Orland, IN 46776 | $13,828 |
31 | Steury Brothers Construction Co Stateline Farms | Spencerville, IN 46788 | $13,507 |
32 | James M Haynes | Garrett, IN 46738 | $12,802 |
33 | Danny L Bremer | Monroeville, IN 46773 | $12,771 |
34 | Moore Farms | Woodburn, IN 46797 | $12,662 |
35 | The Donnell D Willibey Rev Trust | Hamilton, IN 46742 | $12,514 |
36 | David Salomon | Fort Wayne, IN 46845 | $12,412 |
37 | Phillips Farms | Waterloo, IN 46793 | $12,320 |
38 | Roland L Seiler | Auburn, IN 46706 | $11,764 |
39 | Paul D Wilson | Monroeville, IN 46773 | $11,723 |
40 | Bruce A Laub | Saint Joe, IN 46785 | $11,535 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”