Conservation Reserve Program in 4th District of Indiana (Rep. James Baird), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,932
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 4th District of Indiana (Rep. James Baird) totaled $4,612,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Robert Kerkhove | West Lafayette, IN 47906 | $15,438 |
42 | Buchanan Farms Partnership | Fowler, IN 47944 | $15,310 |
43 | Robert Lane | Brook, IN 47922 | $14,924 |
44 | Arch Alexander | West Lafayette, IN 47906 | $14,895 |
45 | John W Wells | Darlington, IN 47940 | $14,872 |
46 | Norma Jean Bennett | Crawfordsville, IN 47933 | $14,520 |
47 | Bryan Walters | Indianapolis, IN 46239 | $14,381 |
48 | Warren C Johnson Jr | Morocco, IN 47963 | $14,344 |
49 | G & J Johns Farms Inc | Idaville, IN 47950 | $14,296 |
50 | Jewel Land Corporation | Morocco, IN 47963 | $14,250 |
51 | Marilyn R Schurman | Demotte, IN 46310 | $14,169 |
52 | James J Vorst | West Lafayette, IN 47906 | $14,157 |
53 | Joann Vorst | West Lafayette, IN 47906 | $14,157 |
54 | Randall S Hall | Kentland, IN 47951 | $13,886 |
55 | Ellen D Swift Rev Tr | Crawfordsville, IN 47933 | $13,642 |
56 | Suiter Farms Partnership | Earl Park, IN 47942 | $13,602 |
57 | Srk Farms LLC | Lafayette, IN 47905 | $13,546 |
58 | Terry Cain | Darlington, IN 47940 | $13,424 |
59 | Deloris A Hall | Kentland, IN 47951 | $13,344 |
60 | Wilson Farms Inc | Rensselaer, IN 47978 | $13,243 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”