Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in 4th District of Indiana (Rep. James Baird), 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,117
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in 4th District of Indiana (Rep. James Baird) totaled $89,961,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Suiter Farms Partnership | Earl Park, IN 47942 | $620,407 |
| 2 | Buchanan Farms Partnership | Fowler, IN 47944 | $567,294 |
| 3 | Huffer & Huffer | Cutler, IN 46920 | $513,834 |
| 4 | Beacon Credit Union ** | Wabash, IN 46992 | $509,470 |
| 5 | Consolidated Acres | Camden, IN 46917 | $451,338 |
| 6 | Wci Family Farms | Crawfordsville, IN 47933 | $438,970 |
| 7 | I & S Furrer Farms Inc | Wolcott, IN 47995 | $374,006 |
| 8 | Schroeder Farms Swine Division In | Reynolds, IN 47980 | $361,572 |
| 9 | Geswein Farms Gp | Westpoint, IN 47992 | $358,999 |
| 10 | Furrer Brothers Ag, LLC | Brookston, IN 47923 | $344,388 |
| 11 | Prairies Edge Farming Co LLC | Demotte, IN 46310 | $325,485 |
| 12 | Layer/roth Farms, LLC | Monticello, IN 47960 | $322,787 |
| 13 | Ja Wise Farms Inc | Delphi, IN 46923 | $321,168 |
| 14 | Dorn Farms | Demotte, IN 46310 | $318,879 |
| 15 | L & S Peters Farms Inc | Bringhurst, IN 46913 | $310,824 |
| 16 | Hudson Farms Co Inc | Crawfordsville, IN 47933 | $293,408 |
| 17 | Smolek L & G Inc | Idaville, IN 47950 | $290,739 |
| 18 | Maxwell Farms General Partnership | Delphi, IN 46923 | $288,978 |
| 19 | Clark Family Ag LLC | Remington, IN 47977 | $285,892 |
| 20 | Churchill Farms Partners | Lake Village, IN 46349 | $283,579 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf