Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 6th District of Indiana (Rep. Greg Pence), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,104

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 6th District of Indiana (Rep. Greg Pence) totaled $50,866,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
21Hoeing Livestock Farms IncRushville, IN 46173$179,145
22Ripberger Farms IncFalmouth, IN 46127$178,736
23C And M Lawyer FarmNew Castle, IN 47362$177,811
24Thurston FarmsFountain City, IN 47341$172,975
25Ridgeline Pork LLCVersailles, OH 45380$170,591
26Starr Farms Partnership, IncConnersville, IN 47331$167,528
27Stephen OsborneRushville, IN 46173$150,454
28Harmeyer Farms IncBatesville, IN 47006$148,773
29Village Creek Farms LLCConnersville, IN 47331$145,338
30Donald J MyersBrownsville, IN 47325$144,500
31Thomas C Stewart,james G Stewart & Stephen G GunnGreensburg, IN 47240$136,510
32Bedrock Farm Operations LLCModoc, IN 47358$134,879
33Philip & Donald Kramer PartnershipGreensburg, IN 47240$131,561
34M & S Narwold Farm IncBatesville, IN 47006$130,240
35L & S Narwold Farm IncBatesville, IN 47006$130,238
36Jolly Brothers Farm LLCVersailles, IN 47042$128,904
37Kopp's Turkey Sales, IncHarrison, OH 45030$127,573
38Holtkamp Farms IncGreensburg, IN 47240$123,003
39Greg KunkelBrookville, IN 47012$120,752
40Morgrain PartnersMilroy, IN 46156$117,871

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag