Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in 6th District of Indiana (Rep. Greg Pence), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 427
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in 6th District of Indiana (Rep. Greg Pence) totaled $888,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | John Shaw | Vevay, IN 47043 | $3,500 |
62 | Vernon Herbert | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $3,500 |
63 | Harry S Kinney Farms | Columbus, IN 47201 | $3,500 |
64 | Glen D Hensley Revocable Trust | Anderson, IN 46012 | $3,500 |
65 | Alice Marie Blodgett | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $3,500 |
66 | Donald Greiwe | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $3,500 |
67 | David A Bohman | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $3,500 |
68 | Alvin Kramer | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $3,500 |
69 | Walter King | Cambridge City, IN 47327 | $3,500 |
70 | John Megee Inc | Rushville, IN 46173 | $3,500 |
71 | Ajr Farms Inc | Eaton, OH 45320 | $3,500 |
72 | Narwold Farms Inc | Batesville, IN 47006 | $3,500 |
73 | T & A Farms Wrong Id Do Not Use | Westport, IN 47283 | $3,500 |
74 | Jerry W Ison | Madison, IN 47250 | $3,500 |
75 | Evelyn Wilson | Milton, IN 47357 | $3,500 |
76 | Earl C Anderson Sr | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $3,489 |
77 | Robert F Dawson | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $3,477 |
78 | Dennis Belter | Batesville, IN 47006 | $3,464 |
79 | Lillian Mikesell | Richmond, IN 47374 | $3,457 |
80 | Terry Hitchel | Westport, IN 47283 | $3,446 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”