Market Loss Assistance Program in 6th District of Indiana (Rep. Greg Pence), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 6,013
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in 6th District of Indiana (Rep. Greg Pence) totaled $62,819,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | El Lu Farms Inc Dba Nobbe Seeds | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $76,106 |
102 | Charles Fogg | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $75,733 |
103 | Jeffrey Pentecost | Centerville, IN 47330 | $75,038 |
104 | Steve Oler | Economy, IN 47339 | $74,585 |
105 | David Vanosdol | Arlington, IN 46104 | $74,556 |
106 | Fussner Farms | Rushville, IN 46173 | $74,008 |
107 | Walter Nobbe | Connersville, IN 47331 | $73,722 |
108 | Larry A Senour | Rushville, IN 46173 | $73,338 |
109 | Peetz Farms Inc | Osgood, IN 47037 | $73,237 |
110 | Larry Bredewater | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $73,029 |
111 | William Hance | Madison, IN 47250 | $72,686 |
112 | Edward A Dierckman | Batesville, IN 47006 | $72,555 |
113 | Jerry D Wiseman | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $72,235 |
114 | Gauck Farms Inc | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $72,232 |
115 | Daniel L Hoeing | Rushville, IN 46173 | $72,199 |
116 | Lowell Pflum | Cambridge City, IN 47327 | $71,752 |
117 | Oral F Myers | Cambridge City, IN 47327 | $71,740 |
118 | Kenneth J Pflum | Milton, IN 47357 | $71,409 |
119 | John Busald Farm Inc | Rushville, IN 46173 | $71,361 |
120 | John Schutte | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $70,988 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”