Total Conservation Programs in 6th District of Indiana (Rep. Greg Pence), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 4,809

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 6th District of Indiana (Rep. Greg Pence) totaled $98,919,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2023
1Miers Farm CorpGreensburg, IN 47240$553,714
2Robert H MulfordVersailles, IN 47042$512,909
3Whitewater Valley Land Trust IncCenterville, IN 47330$444,111
4Peggy Ann Ehlers Revocable TrustVersailles, IN 47042$400,773
5Ron CoffmanLiberty, IN 47353$366,119
6Menkedick Farms LLCWestport, IN 47283$347,884
7Richard C PlackeBatesville, IN 47006$343,775
8Thayer Farms IncOsgood, IN 47037$329,718
9Eastern Whitewater Valley Land Trust IncCenterville, IN 47330$329,633
10Doherty IncRichmond, IN 47374$324,636
11Southern Whitewater Valley Land TrustCenterville, IN 47330$322,975
12Thomas C Stewart,james G Stewart & Stephen G GunnGreensburg, IN 47240$320,700
13Wenning Farms IncGreensburg, IN 47240$320,099
14Village Creek Farms LLCConnersville, IN 47331$310,907
15Howard MoffettConnersville, IN 47331$299,322
16Doerstler FarmsGreens Fork, IN 47345$296,900
17Evelyn E Moffett Fam TrustConnersville, IN 47331$290,668
18Gettinger Family Limited PartnersMilton, IN 47357$282,253
19Chc Partners IncGreensburg, IN 47240$263,580
20Raymond BedelMetamora, IN 47030$261,057

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag