Environmental Quality Incentives Program in 6th District of Indiana (Rep. Greg Pence), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 182
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in 6th District of Indiana (Rep. Greg Pence) totaled $1,041,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Ronald G Evans | Moores Hill, IN 47032 | $12,243 |
22 | Burke Trust | Lafayette, IN 47902 | $11,098 |
23 | Stein Farms Inc | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $10,357 |
24 | George Truster | Manilla, IN 46150 | $10,239 |
25 | Bryan Sasser | Connersville, IN 47331 | $10,104 |
26 | Keith M Mcgathey | Richmond, IN 47374 | $10,064 |
27 | E & D Howell Farms Inc | Losantville, IN 47354 | $9,510 |
28 | John Hardebeck | Westport, IN 47283 | $9,482 |
29 | Evelyn Johannigman | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $9,126 |
30 | Donald R Martin | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $8,972 |
31 | R L Busald Farms Inc | Rushville, IN 46173 | $8,750 |
32 | Coffee Tree Farms | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $8,750 |
33 | Phillip Cofield | Fountain City, IN 47341 | $8,669 |
34 | Mark Huffman | Glenwood, IN 46133 | $8,109 |
35 | Kenneth Demaree | Cross Plains, IN 47017 | $8,011 |
36 | Bruns Midway Farm Inc | Laurel, IN 47024 | $7,450 |
37 | D & S Volk Farming Inc | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $7,200 |
38 | Dennis Sherck | Connersville, IN 47331 | $7,144 |
39 | Troy Benge | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $7,106 |
40 | Marilyn Summitt | Richmond, IN 47374 | $6,712 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”