Total Commodity Programs in 6th District of Indiana (Rep. Greg Pence), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 13,997

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 6th District of Indiana (Rep. Greg Pence) totaled $876,317,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2023
1Agri Business Finance **St Paris, OH 43072$4,353,964
2Ag Production Ent IncGreensburg, IN 47240$3,322,089
34-way Production IncGreensburg, IN 47240$3,077,169
4Hulsbosch Dairy Farm LLCGreensburg, IN 47240$3,058,397
5Doerstler FarmsGreens Fork, IN 47345$3,053,578
6Thomas C Stewart,james G Stewart & Stephen G GunnGreensburg, IN 47240$2,249,139
7Ron CoffmanLiberty, IN 47353$2,138,806
8Starr Farms Partnership, IncConnersville, IN 47331$2,110,470
9B G Reiger Farms IncGreensburg, IN 47240$1,998,518
10Ertel Farms IncOsgood, IN 47037$1,980,672
11Beacon Credit Union **Wabash, IN 46992$1,909,374
12Alden Rose Farms IncConnersville, IN 47331$1,854,148
13Corya Pork Farms IncGreensburg, IN 47240$1,829,935
14Roland LawtonTucson, AZ 85712$1,775,082
15Holtkamp Farms IncGreensburg, IN 47240$1,768,246
16Jordan FarmsEaton, OH 45320$1,738,105
17Mark BackCross Plains, IN 47017$1,737,998
18Decatur Farms IncGreensburg, IN 47240$1,703,216
19Mapnap Farm IncBatesville, IN 47006$1,696,272
20Ted HollandSaint Paul, IN 47272$1,671,527

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag