Conservation Reserve Program in 8th District of Indiana (Rep. Larry Bucshon), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,176
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 8th District of Indiana (Rep. Larry Bucshon) totaled $4,364,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | , | $13,228 | |
82 | William L Schwab | Martinsville, IN 46151 | $13,190 |
83 | Bernard Anthony Duncheon Jr | Montgomery, IN 47558 | $12,891 |
84 | Robert J Onyett | Petersburg, IN 47567 | $12,864 |
85 | Ann K Almquist | Evansville, IN 47712 | $12,763 |
86 | David R Nelson | Mount Vernon, IN 47620 | $12,756 |
87 | Borter Farms Inc | Odon, IN 47562 | $12,528 |
88 | The Spenco Farms Limited Partnership | Dallas, TX 75230 | $12,450 |
89 | Maple Land Co LLC | Haubstadt, IN 47639 | $12,446 |
90 | Steve Pride | Elberfeld, IN 47613 | $12,384 |
91 | Deena J Jackson | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $12,235 |
92 | Wagner Farm Property LLC | Chandler, IN 47610 | $12,000 |
93 | Robert Travis Riggins Primary Trust | Lyons, IN 47443 | $11,627 |
94 | Glenn Alan Longabaugh | Hazleton, IN 47640 | $11,614 |
95 | M And W Mcfadin Farms Inc | Mount Vernon, IN 47620 | $11,562 |
96 | John Bobe | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $11,550 |
97 | Trey A Clark | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $11,458 |
98 | Richard Ebler | Sullivan, IN 47882 | $11,426 |
99 | Thomas James Mcdowell | Apopka, FL 32712 | $11,316 |
100 | John Allen Belcher | Pittsburgh, PA 15236 | $11,207 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”