Miscellaneous Farm Programs in 8th District of Indiana (Rep. Larry Bucshon), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 4,312
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in 8th District of Indiana (Rep. Larry Bucshon) totaled $1,269,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Koester Bros Farms Inc | Wadesville, IN 47638 | $5,153 |
22 | Armes Grain & Livestock | Washington, IN 47501 | $5,150 |
23 | Mac-evans Farms Inc | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $5,147 |
24 | Barber & Co | Washington, IN 47501 | $5,140 |
25 | Robert C Wehmer | Poseyville, IN 47633 | $5,128 |
26 | Allen Steckler | Ferdinand, IN 47532 | $5,127 |
27 | John Barber And Sons Inc | Montgomery, IN 47558 | $5,117 |
28 | Paul Werner Begle | Dale, IN 47523 | $5,108 |
29 | C M Saalweachter & Sons | Wadesville, IN 47638 | $5,098 |
30 | Franklin Thomas & Sons Farms Inc | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $5,097 |
31 | Schmitt Ag Products | Poseyville, IN 47633 | $5,092 |
32 | Sam Burkhart & Son Farms | Washington, IN 47501 | $5,086 |
33 | Dale Worland | Bicknell, IN 47512 | $5,077 |
34 | Keller Bros Farms Inc | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $5,074 |
35 | Swartzentruber Farms Inc | Odon, IN 47562 | $5,063 |
36 | Lubbehusen Farms | Dale, IN 47523 | $5,055 |
37 | Rex Chattin | Oaktown, IN 47561 | $5,054 |
38 | Richard Hasenour | Fort Branch, IN 47648 | $5,045 |
39 | Cletus Schaefer | Evanston, IN 47531 | $5,044 |
40 | Maurice Baumgart | Haubstadt, IN 47639 | $5,040 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”