Conservation Reserve Program in 8th District of Indiana (Rep. Larry Bucshon), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,265
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 8th District of Indiana (Rep. Larry Bucshon) totaled $4,441,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Anson Brothers | Monroe City, IN 47557 | $80,020 |
2 | Evans & Sons Farms LLC | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $57,013 |
3 | Dale & Dennis Newton LLC | Bruceville, IN 47516 | $50,000 |
4 | Charles H Ray Jr | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $50,000 |
5 | Patricia Wright | Oakland, CA 94619 | $49,922 |
6 | Klug Farms LLC | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $48,104 |
7 | Michael D Horrall | Petersburg, IN 47567 | $47,031 |
8 | Mary Louise Hess | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $46,877 |
9 | Wallace Linneweber | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $46,178 |
10 | Kathryn J Linneweber | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $46,178 |
11 | Field Farms Inc | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $45,612 |
12 | Dr Henry J Matick | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $44,331 |
13 | Kenneth R Reising | Fort Branch, IN 47648 | $43,750 |
14 | Fl Wilson Inc | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $42,518 |
15 | Christian A Rudolph | Petersburg, IN 47567 | $41,012 |
16 | Burch Harlan Co Inc | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $39,656 |
17 | Carter Farms Inc | Lewis, IN 47858 | $39,132 |
18 | Amy Rudolph | Petersburg, IN 47567 | $38,800 |
19 | Strain Farms Inc | Farmersburg, IN 47850 | $33,728 |
20 | Patoka Valley Conservation Partners LLC | Newburgh, IN 47630 | $33,468 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>