Farm Subsidy information
9th District of Indiana
(Rep. Trey Hollingsworth)
Total Subsidies in 9th District of Indiana (Rep. Trey Hollingsworth), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,214
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 9th District of Indiana (Rep. Trey Hollingsworth) totaled $6,796,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Anthony Deen Ciarleglio | Mauckport, IN 47142 | $53,327 |
22 | Cottongim Farms LLC | Salem, IN 47167 | $53,022 |
23 | Mike Baker Trucking LLC | Salem, IN 47167 | $52,875 |
24 | Hacker Sawmill & Trucking Inc | Salem, IN 47167 | $52,875 |
25 | William Jacobi | Palmyra, IN 47164 | $52,761 |
26 | Todd Shields | Salem, IN 47167 | $51,332 |
27 | Mcafee Brothers Farms LLC | Depauw, IN 47115 | $50,663 |
28 | Matthew L Purlee | Salem, IN 47167 | $50,033 |
29 | Randy Hauger | Salem, IN 47167 | $49,250 |
30 | Beach Farms LLC | Palmyra, IN 47164 | $49,063 |
31 | Brent A Rosenbaum | Salem, IN 47167 | $48,743 |
32 | Schmelz Farms LLC | New Salisbury, IN 47161 | $46,704 |
33 | Ford Farms Trust | Pekin, IN 47165 | $45,966 |
34 | Fred Uhl | Palmyra, IN 47164 | $45,684 |
35 | James & Michael Book Farms Inc | Palmyra, IN 47164 | $44,155 |
36 | Benjamin L Shireman | Palmyra, IN 47164 | $42,603 |
37 | Dewayne Williams | Campbellsburg, IN 47108 | $41,424 |
38 | K Michael Flock | Ramsey, IN 47166 | $41,106 |
39 | Michael D Ponsford | Salem, IN 47167 | $40,630 |
40 | W S Roberts & Sons Inc | Campbellsburg, IN 47108 | $40,602 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”