Total Disaster Programs in 9th District of Indiana (Rep. Trey Hollingsworth), 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 208
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in 9th District of Indiana (Rep. Trey Hollingsworth) totaled $1,826,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Schmelz Farms LLC | New Salisbury, IN 47161 | $24,877 |
22 | Brent A Rosenbaum | Salem, IN 47167 | $24,528 |
23 | R Darin Sweeney | Campbellsburg, IN 47108 | $23,313 |
24 | Dewayne Williams | Campbellsburg, IN 47108 | $22,589 |
25 | Matthew L Purlee | Salem, IN 47167 | $22,491 |
26 | Darren Trueblood | Salem, IN 47167 | $20,444 |
27 | Cottongim Farms LLC | Salem, IN 47167 | $18,996 |
28 | Gary D Chastain | Campbellsburg, IN 47108 | $18,796 |
29 | Larry J Buechler | Palmyra, IN 47164 | $18,120 |
30 | Douglas Hackney | Paoli, IN 47454 | $18,074 |
31 | Clark Love | Orleans, IN 47452 | $18,074 |
32 | Mcafee Brothers Farms LLC | Depauw, IN 47115 | $17,765 |
33 | Lorrie Sullivan | Campbellsburg, IN 47108 | $15,844 |
34 | Jeff And John Miller Farms Inc | Elizabeth, IN 47117 | $15,712 |
35 | Thomas L Hackman | Vallonia, IN 47281 | $14,795 |
36 | A Chris Miller | Corydon, IN 47112 | $14,627 |
37 | Denny E Mckinley | Salem, IN 47167 | $14,604 |
38 | Scott Mckinley | Salem, IN 47167 | $14,603 |
39 | Earl M Baker | Palmyra, IN 47164 | $13,845 |
40 | William J Elrod | Salem, IN 47167 | $13,325 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”