Farm Subsidy information
1st District of Kansas
(Rep. Roger Marshall)
Total Subsidies in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 20,570
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $335,623,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Hendricks Bros Partnership | Bird City, KS 67731 | $548,826 |
22 | Winsome Farms Gp | Johnson, KS 67855 | $521,878 |
23 | Mackley Farms | Colby, KS 67701 | $503,912 |
24 | Four B Farms | Scott City, KS 67871 | $483,103 |
25 | Luckert Farms J V | Brewster, KS 67732 | $477,225 |
26 | , | $464,468 | |
27 | M & G Farms | Johnson, KS 67855 | $461,327 |
28 | , | $460,824 | |
29 | Sipes Land & Cattle Inc | Manter, KS 67862 | $460,293 |
30 | Horinek Brothers | Trenton, NE 69044 | $457,503 |
31 | Bar S Ranch Inc | Paradise, KS 67658 | $454,531 |
32 | Sam & Jan Crouse Joint Venture | Atwood, KS 67730 | $453,226 |
33 | Wt Partnership | Bird City, KS 67731 | $450,172 |
34 | Verdell Young & Son | Tribune, KS 67879 | $446,809 |
35 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $443,320 |
36 | Leibbrandt Farms | Atwood, KS 67730 | $434,708 |
37 | Devin Douglas Spears | Osborne, KS 67473 | $434,242 |
38 | Ez Farms Gp | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $430,157 |
39 | Boekhaus & Boekhaus | Richfield, KS 67953 | $425,650 |
40 | Quentin T Maupin | Paradise, KS 67658 | $423,780 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”