Conservation Reserve Program in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 45,791

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $1,888,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
21William W Boekhaus Living TrustRichfield, KS 67953$1,070,885
22Dos ReatasAustin, TX 78746$1,063,229
23Don WilkenLeoti, KS 67861$1,062,093
24Jo ParkersonNess City, KS 67560$1,054,024
25Timothy J HaslettSyracuse, KS 67878$1,052,360
26S U HuelskampMinneola, KS 67865$1,045,178
27Midwestern Farming CoSaint Paul, KS 66771$1,034,824
28Isaac Farms IncPeoria, AZ 85383$1,033,164
29Irl And Ruth Brassfield TrustBogue, KS 67625$1,018,995
30Winger Cattle Co IncJohnson, KS 67855$1,017,922
31Mitchco Farms IncBeloit, KS 67420$1,017,771
32Bellamy Aerial Spraying IncElwood, NE 68937$1,016,602
33Dennis D StewartManter, KS 67862$1,010,457
34Vernon Ray Bearce Living TrustDodge City, KS 67801$1,003,408
35Love & Love FarmsMontezuma, KS 67867$994,920
36Joseph Scheopner Rev TrustGoodland, KS 67735$987,615
37Sheila A BreedingRolla, KS 67954$982,965
38Menno A FriesenMeade, KS 67864$978,694
39Hell Creek Ranch IncEl Dorado Springs, MO 64744$976,004
40Ronald G Degarmo TrustRolla, KS 67954$963,041

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag