Total Emergency Relief Program in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 9,354
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $230,909,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mackley Farms | Colby, KS 67701 | $500,000 |
22 | Smith Bros | Richfield, KS 67953 | $484,904 |
23 | Luckert Farms J V | Brewster, KS 67732 | $474,841 |
24 | Four B Farms | Scott City, KS 67871 | $472,626 |
25 | , | $464,468 | |
26 | M & G Farms | Johnson, KS 67855 | $455,665 |
27 | Verdell Young & Son | Tribune, KS 67879 | $446,809 |
28 | Devin Douglas Spears | Osborne, KS 67473 | $434,242 |
29 | Sipes Land & Cattle Inc | Manter, KS 67862 | $432,397 |
30 | Leibbrandt Farms | Atwood, KS 67730 | $430,155 |
31 | Sam & Jan Crouse Joint Venture | Atwood, KS 67730 | $428,568 |
32 | Wt Partnership | Bird City, KS 67731 | $428,422 |
33 | Horinek Brothers | Trenton, NE 69044 | $428,289 |
34 | Boekhaus & Boekhaus | Richfield, KS 67953 | $424,510 |
35 | Hatcher Land & Cattle Co | Liberal, KS 67901 | $404,963 |
36 | Empire Prairie Gp | Goodland, KS 67735 | $398,707 |
37 | Ez Farms Gp | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $385,259 |
38 | Downing Family Farms | Colby, KS 67701 | $383,264 |
39 | Rustin Allan Seger | Johnson, KS 67855 | $380,173 |
40 | Mark Akers | Kendall, KS 67857 | $377,399 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”