Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 38,757
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $712,994,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Nairn & Nairn Farms | Johnson, KS 67855 | $705,670 |
22 | E&d Farms | Marienthal, KS 67863 | $700,471 |
23 | Hendricks Bros Partnership | Bird City, KS 67731 | $692,340 |
24 | Tim Dewey Farms | Cimarron, KS 67835 | $679,847 |
25 | Valley State Bank | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $673,459 |
26 | Billips Farms | Hill City, KS 67642 | $666,474 |
27 | K-d Farms | Scott City, KS 67871 | $655,141 |
28 | Barnhardt Farms Partnership | Lakin, KS 67860 | $654,278 |
29 | Rooney Farms | Lakin, KS 67860 | $654,186 |
30 | Whit-crop | Leoti, KS 67861 | $639,940 |
31 | Winsome Farms Gp | Johnson, KS 67855 | $633,864 |
32 | Premier 4 Farms Partnership | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $633,036 |
33 | F & J Farms | Goodland, KS 67735 | $627,469 |
34 | Homestead Farms | Wallace, KS 67761 | $626,969 |
35 | C-l Farms | Johnson, KS 67855 | $592,934 |
36 | Southwest Family Farms | Plains, KS 67869 | $579,188 |
37 | F D K Partnership | Rexford, KS 67753 | $565,667 |
38 | Nic II Farms | Johnson, KS 67855 | $563,551 |
39 | Sterling Farms | Garden City, KS 67846 | $553,682 |
40 | Stapleton Farms Partnership | Meade, KS 67864 | $550,540 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”