Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 63
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $151,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jacob Loewen | Seminole, TX 79360 | $893 |
22 | Ronda Penn | Ingalls, KS 67853 | $858 |
23 | Michael And Dana Spencer Family Farms, LLC | Colony, KS 66015 | $828 |
24 | Stephen M Mccormick | South Fork, CO 81154 | $763 |
25 | Witt-matheny Trust | San Diego, CA 92101 | $757 |
26 | Waller Real Est | Garden City, KS 67846 | $742 |
27 | Fansher Farms Partnership | Garden City, KS 67846 | $660 |
28 | Elva Johnson Great American Land LLC Elva F Johnso | Rolla, KS 67954 | $643 |
29 | Olomon Living Trust | Canon City, CO 81212 | $565 |
30 | Max D Mead | Bullhead City, AZ 86442 | $542 |
31 | Glenda J Mead | Bullhead City, AZ 86442 | $541 |
32 | Ted L Burnett Test Trust | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $527 |
33 | Dana Zielke | Pensacola, FL 32514 | $521 |
34 | Donald P Grewell Rev Trust -donald P Grewell | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $479 |
35 | Ronald J Lager | Grinnell, KS 67738 | $450 |
36 | The Preston A Dew And Betty J Dew | Garden City, KS 67846 | $291 |
37 | , | $247 | |
38 | , | $246 | |
39 | Mark K Stilwell | White City, KS 66872 | $242 |
40 | Robert J Miller | Garden City, KS 67846 | $230 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”