Emergency Conservation Program in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,004
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $17,715,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | John E Bosch Tr No 1 | Austin, TX 78731 | $85,892 |
42 | Clawson Ranch Partnership | Plains, KS 67869 | $82,209 |
43 | M G Oil Inc | Russell, KS 67665 | $82,114 |
44 | Neal A Smith Trust | Osborne, KS 67473 | $76,219 |
45 | Edward J Weigel II | Russell, KS 67665 | $75,606 |
46 | Schlessiger Cattle Inc | Claflin, KS 67525 | $74,860 |
47 | Schmeidler Living Trust | Hays, KS 67601 | $74,135 |
48 | Thomas D Walters Jr | Hays, KS 67601 | $70,936 |
49 | Meyer Land And Cattle Co | Sylvan Grove, KS 67481 | $70,830 |
50 | Jason W Rathbun | Plainville, KS 67663 | $70,626 |
51 | Kevin Schmeidler | Victoria, KS 67671 | $68,920 |
52 | Ward D Craig | Russell, KS 67665 | $67,100 |
53 | Florence A Thompson | Russell, KS 67665 | $65,268 |
54 | Steven J Graff | Leoti, KS 67861 | $62,169 |
55 | Charlotte Pierson-david | Russell, KS 67665 | $60,422 |
56 | L J Living Trust | Logan, KS 67646 | $57,911 |
57 | Thomas R Weinhold | Wilson, KS 67490 | $57,354 |
58 | Jared Allen Hammersmith | Gorham, KS 67640 | $57,163 |
59 | Lazy H Cattle Co | Deerfield, KS 67838 | $56,484 |
60 | Frank J Schmidt | Quitman, TX 75783 | $56,278 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”