Hard Winter Wheat Incentive Program in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 3,849
Recipients of Hard Winter Wheat Incentive Program from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $7,215,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Hard Winter Wheat Incentive Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | E G Amerin | Plains, KS 67869 | $15,880 |
42 | Alex Nichepor Jr | Ness City, KS 67560 | $15,870 |
43 | C & S Farms | Scott City, KS 67871 | $15,769 |
44 | Charles R Downs Trust | Leoti, KS 67861 | $15,744 |
45 | Double C Farms | Johnson, KS 67855 | $15,688 |
46 | Lamer Farms Inc | Scottsdale, AZ 85258 | $15,680 |
47 | Bryant Farms | Copeland, KS 67837 | $15,625 |
48 | Tuttle Grains Partnership | Tribune, KS 67879 | $15,450 |
49 | Tim Dewey Farms | Cimarron, KS 67835 | $15,339 |
50 | Cline Farms | Liberal, KS 67901 | $15,060 |
51 | Kfr Inc | Hays, KS 67601 | $15,028 |
52 | Larry R Ochs | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $14,917 |
53 | R & S Farms | Johnson, KS 67855 | $14,678 |
54 | Jon C Friesen | Colby, KS 67701 | $14,542 |
55 | Goshen Farms | Tribune, KS 67879 | $14,410 |
56 | Larry D Weeks Living Trust | Brownell, KS 67521 | $14,343 |
57 | Richard Frick | Nekoma, KS 67559 | $14,343 |
58 | Hazel Russell | Montezuma, KS 67867 | $14,304 |
59 | J&l Partnership | Leoti, KS 67861 | $14,152 |
60 | Melvin Hair | Brownell, KS 67521 | $13,984 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”