Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 13,050

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $249,687,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1
1995-2023
41Stacy Koehn Bar W CattleMountain Grove, MO 65711$395,563
42Deerfield Feeders IncTribune, KS 67879$382,458
43Sealock IncHoxie, KS 67740$373,014
44D & M Cattle IncGrinnell, KS 67738$370,835
45Tice Cattle IncSublette, KS 67877$357,134
46High Plains Ponderosa Dairy LLCPlains, KS 67869$348,635
47Schlessiger Cattle IncClaflin, KS 67525$343,886
48Tuls Dairy Farms LLCLiberal, KS 67905$300,000
493-b Cattle Co IncBeloit, KS 67420$299,703
50J L Livengood Farms IncGoodland, KS 67735$283,041
51North Wheatridge LLCLong Island, KS 67647$277,796
52R & S Van Loenen Farms LLCPrairie View, KS 67664$274,464
53Grabbe Farms LLCHays, KS 67601$270,827
54Keeott Farms IncClay Center, KS 67432$257,256
55Kansas Dairy Development LLCDeerfield, KS 67838$256,549
56Brunner Livestock LLCRamona, KS 67475$251,725
57Martin Land & Livestock LLCClay Center, KS 67432$250,132
58Esslinger Ranch IncNorton, KS 67654$250,000
59Arden PetersonSolomon, KS 67480$250,000
60John J CranstonColby, KS 67701$250,000

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag