Farm Subsidy information
1st District of Kansas
(Rep. Roger Marshall)
Total Subsidies in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 37,526
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $411,688,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | F&f Farms Gp | Alden, KS 67512 | $256,292 |
42 | Homeland Farms | Sharon Springs, KS 67758 | $253,170 |
43 | Neosho Gardens LLC | Council Grove, KS 66846 | $253,015 |
44 | Triag | Ellinwood, KS 67526 | $251,583 |
45 | Hamilton Brothers | Ensign, KS 67841 | $250,849 |
46 | Flying S Partnership | Oberlin, KS 67749 | $250,643 |
47 | Bryant Farms | Copeland, KS 67837 | $248,449 |
48 | Whirlwind Acres Partnership | Sharon Springs, KS 67758 | $248,069 |
49 | Legacy H Farms | Colby, KS 67701 | $246,517 |
50 | Mark Cavenee Farms Jv | Tribune, KS 67879 | $242,848 |
51 | K Ranch | Garden City, KS 67868 | $240,619 |
52 | Lewis Wheeler & Lee Wheeler L & L Farms | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $236,837 |
53 | Nairn & Nairn Farms | Johnson, KS 67855 | $234,990 |
54 | Mackley Farms | Colby, KS 67701 | $234,632 |
55 | N And A Farms | Atwood, KS 67730 | $234,284 |
56 | Billips Farms | Hill City, KS 67642 | $234,175 |
57 | Brown Enterprises | Sublette, KS 67877 | $230,250 |
58 | Franklin Farms | Atwood, KS 67730 | $227,624 |
59 | Tip Off Farms | Scott City, KS 67871 | $226,709 |
60 | Phil A Dirks | Ingalls, KS 67853 | $220,907 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”