Conservation Reserve Program in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 45,791

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $1,888,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
41Guldner Farms IncSyracuse, KS 67878$957,757
42Joseph C BradyCoaldale, CO 81222$952,556
43Smith Ranch Company IncWallace, KS 67761$950,529
44Shane SullivanUlysses, KS 67880$948,233
45Lpr IncRussell Springs, KS 67764$946,791
46Woodford-o'brate IncGarden City, KS 67846$942,112
47Morris Farms IncKansas City, MO 64112$941,323
48Herbert C Klassen Rev TrustKendall, KS 67857$940,175
49Darrell McbeeLaverne, OK 73848$939,967
50Richard E Rudzik Tr Dated June 22 1992Ulysses, KS 67880$936,114
51T L Swart TrustGrinnell, KS 67738$935,358
52Irsik Family PartnershipGarden City, KS 67846$934,427
53Larry J Heinz TrustMcpherson, KS 67460$932,285
54Corley Farms L CGarden City, KS 67846$927,284
55Beymer & Beymer IncLakin, KS 67860$927,172
56Trifecta Farms IncLakin, KS 67860$911,968
57John H IrvinMc Cracken, KS 67556$908,913
58Howard John GibsonTribune, KS 67879$903,178
59Grandview Farms CoIndependence, MO 64055$900,104
60Kansas Univ Endow AssociationHutchinson, KS 67504$896,875

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag