Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 2021

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 162

Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $806,000 in in 2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Market Facilitation Program (MFP)
2021
41Lazy T Land And Cattle LLCUlysses, KS 67880$5,198
42Paul N Shriver Testamentary TrPratt, KS 67124$4,891
43Albert Thornbrough Living TrustBoca Raton, FL 33432$4,813
44Gerald JenkinsonTehachapi, CA 93561$4,401
45Junghans Farms LcJunction City, KS 66441$4,390
46Walter Redger Rev TrustDodge City, KS 67801$4,127
47Gooder And Shirley Simpson Rvoc TrBarnesville, MN 56514$4,123
48Velma Gigot Trust AGarden City, KS 67846$3,813
49Patti Jean Grieshaber Trust Share Uad 01/23/1996Elkhart, KS 67950$3,795
50Morgan II Family TrustColorado Springs, CO 80949$3,778
51Lester I Deines Trust 1Chapman, KS 67431$3,462
52Jim F KemperMckinney, TX 75070$3,222
53Jeri Rice TrustLiberal, KS 67901$3,203
54Sfh Trust 89'Garden City, KS 67846$3,157
55Trust Share For Kelly R Cavner Uad 2/23/2001Stillwater, OK 74074$3,135
56Todd Christopher Brown TrustHutchinson, KS 67504$3,106
57Willard S Link Farm Trust Uad 12/10/2008Rolla, KS 67954$3,068
58Jack And Jacqueline Banta TrustWichita, KS 67211$3,002
59Gennelle J Linville Separate Property TrustSanta Barbara, CA 93103$2,991
60Carol J TurnerBillings, MT 59105$2,953

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag