Farm Subsidy information
1st District of Kansas
(Rep. Roger Marshall)
Total Subsidies in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 37,526
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $411,688,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Four B Farms | Scott City, KS 67871 | $220,067 |
62 | Valley State Bank | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $217,822 |
63 | Gayla M Schubert | Lyons, KS 67554 | $217,219 |
64 | Klc Farm | Satanta, KS 67870 | $216,782 |
65 | Triangle H | Garden City, KS 67846 | $215,592 |
66 | Patricia A Lahey | Moscow, KS 67952 | $215,098 |
67 | K & K Farms | Concordia, KS 66901 | $214,420 |
68 | Barnhardt Farms Partnership | Lakin, KS 67860 | $211,610 |
69 | Thomas L Lahey | Moscow, KS 67952 | $209,862 |
70 | Fairleigh Ranch | Scott City, KS 67871 | $207,488 |
71 | Triple S Farms | Tribune, KS 67879 | $201,448 |
72 | Jstfrmn Operating LLC | Hays, KS 67601 | $201,282 |
73 | Smith Brothers Feeders LLC | Richfield, KS 67953 | $201,067 |
74 | Lone Tree Farm, Gp | Scott City, KS 67871 | $199,571 |
75 | 3-d Farms | Edson, KS 67733 | $198,569 |
76 | Boekhaus & Boekhaus | Richfield, KS 67953 | $198,541 |
77 | J P Sons LLC | Dorrance, KS 67634 | $197,961 |
78 | Hamlin Farms Partnership | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $197,484 |
79 | Hipp Farms LLC | Claflin, KS 67525 | $197,352 |
80 | Stegman Farms Partnership | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $195,612 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”