Total Conservation Programs in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 10,599
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $49,151,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | John Simon | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $45,877 |
62 | Marjorie Nairn-marjorie L Nairn Rev Trust | Johnson, KS 67855 | $45,857 |
63 | Joel Miller | Scott City, KS 67871 | $45,422 |
64 | Keegan Nairn | Johnson, KS 67855 | $45,386 |
65 | Ez Farms Gp | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $44,898 |
66 | , | $44,668 | |
67 | Vicki S Valentine | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $44,661 |
68 | Lynn Johnson | Copeland, KS 67837 | $44,384 |
69 | Winger Cattle Co Inc | Johnson, KS 67855 | $44,134 |
70 | Carl G Wenger And Deola A Wenger Rev Joint Tr | Hesston, KS 67062 | $44,133 |
71 | John S Standley | Garden City, KS 67846 | $44,021 |
72 | , | $43,804 | |
73 | Sara Mcfarland Trust | Cimarron, KS 67835 | $43,653 |
74 | Beymer & Beymer Inc | Lakin, KS 67860 | $43,643 |
75 | , | $43,617 | |
76 | Rubart Investments Lp | Ulysses, KS 67880 | $43,482 |
77 | Greta Mcfarland | Chanute, KS 66720 | $43,384 |
78 | Carl E Kohlhorst Inc | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $43,334 |
79 | Jerald Wartman | Ingalls, KS 67853 | $42,998 |
80 | Patricia P Mcfarland Trust | Cimarron, KS 67835 | $42,998 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”