Farm Subsidy information
1st District of Kansas
(Rep. Roger Marshall)
Total Subsidies in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 20,570
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $335,623,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Baber Inc | Tribune, KS 67879 | $297,763 |
82 | Rocking P LLC | Paradise, KS 67658 | $295,222 |
83 | Circle P Farms | Weskan, KS 67762 | $292,540 |
84 | Benjamin Wieland | Oakley, KS 67748 | $292,385 |
85 | Latham Farms | Winona, KS 67764 | $291,832 |
86 | Denny-nickelson Farms Jv | Colby, KS 67701 | $289,779 |
87 | Doll Partnership | Ingalls, KS 67853 | $289,576 |
88 | R C Geven Farms LLC | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $283,178 |
89 | Akers Farms Inc | Kendall, KS 67857 | $283,103 |
90 | Jeff Henderson Farms Inc | Goodland, KS 67735 | $278,218 |
91 | Paul E Myers | Leoti, KS 67861 | $276,993 |
92 | Stull Cattle Co LLC | Osborne, KS 67473 | $275,651 |
93 | Doll Land And Cattle Inc | Ingalls, KS 67853 | $273,147 |
94 | Love & Love Farms | Montezuma, KS 67867 | $273,056 |
95 | Bert J Stramel | Colby, KS 67701 | $272,216 |
96 | Sarrada Farms | Logan, KS 67646 | $272,040 |
97 | Magnum Ag Partnership | Garden City, KS 67846 | $271,349 |
98 | Sos Farms LLC | Hoxie, KS 67740 | $269,919 |
99 | Plum Creek Farms Partnership | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $269,473 |
100 | Bellamy Aerial Spraying Jv | Goodland, KS 67735 | $266,884 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”