Conservation Reserve Program in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 45,791
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $1,888,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Gould Management Inc | Centennial, CO 80112 | $840,344 |
82 | Wayne Breeding | Rolla, KS 67954 | $839,797 |
83 | Douglas Guldner - Guldner Trust | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $836,803 |
84 | Phyllis Nash Trust | Cimarron, KS 67835 | $835,922 |
85 | Thomas A Reed | Kalvesta, KS 67835 | $829,239 |
86 | Sun Terra Inc | Ness City, KS 67560 | $822,868 |
87 | Ella Mae Julian Rev Trust | Johnson, KS 67855 | $820,184 |
88 | Dennis Legleiter | Gorham, KS 67640 | $818,996 |
89 | Geo Herrmann Inc | Ford, KS 67842 | $815,809 |
90 | Gene Schwerdfeger Irr Trust | Coolidge, KS 67836 | $811,884 |
91 | Sarah B Hume Nutter | Manter, KS 67862 | $807,808 |
92 | D & V Brack Family Limited Partnership | Bullhead City, AZ 86429 | $804,059 |
93 | Douglas Dryland Farms | Lakewood, CO 80227 | $803,129 |
94 | Vernon K Burditt | Ness City, KS 67560 | $802,597 |
95 | Geoffrey Tammen | Albert, KS 67511 | $799,049 |
96 | Alexander J Zerr | Grainfield, KS 67737 | $796,329 |
97 | Mark Kerr | Ness City, KS 67560 | $796,320 |
98 | Bear Creek Farms Inc | Johnson, KS 67855 | $795,513 |
99 | Richard D Strawn | Cimarron, KS 67835 | $794,683 |
100 | Ceb Inc | Lakin, KS 67860 | $794,405 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”