Conservation Reserve Program in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 45,791

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $1,888,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
81Gould Management IncCentennial, CO 80112$840,344
82Wayne BreedingRolla, KS 67954$839,797
83Douglas Guldner - Guldner TrustSyracuse, KS 67878$836,803
84Phyllis Nash TrustCimarron, KS 67835$835,922
85Thomas A ReedKalvesta, KS 67835$829,239
86Sun Terra IncNess City, KS 67560$822,868
87Ella Mae Julian Rev TrustJohnson, KS 67855$820,184
88Dennis LegleiterGorham, KS 67640$818,996
89Geo Herrmann IncFord, KS 67842$815,809
90Gene Schwerdfeger Irr TrustCoolidge, KS 67836$811,884
91Sarah B Hume NutterManter, KS 67862$807,808
92D & V Brack Family Limited PartnershipBullhead City, AZ 86429$804,059
93Douglas Dryland FarmsLakewood, CO 80227$803,129
94Vernon K BurdittNess City, KS 67560$802,597
95Geoffrey TammenAlbert, KS 67511$799,049
96Alexander J ZerrGrainfield, KS 67737$796,329
97Mark KerrNess City, KS 67560$796,320
98Bear Creek Farms IncJohnson, KS 67855$795,513
99Richard D StrawnCimarron, KS 67835$794,683
100Ceb IncLakin, KS 67860$794,405

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag