Total Disaster Programs in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 2,364
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $10,160,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Phil Colberg | Lyons, KS 67554 | $23,888 |
82 | Sellers Farms Inc | Lyons, KS 67554 | $23,775 |
83 | Joshua Helvey | Ellsworth, KS 67439 | $23,610 |
84 | Nathan Olander | Little River, KS 67457 | $23,576 |
85 | Robert Price | Deerfield, KS 67838 | $23,556 |
86 | Caywood Farm Inc | Raymond, KS 67573 | $23,468 |
87 | Andy Zwick | Sterling, KS 67579 | $23,431 |
88 | Cameron C Coleman | Chase, KS 67524 | $23,296 |
89 | Robert L Ochsner | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $23,235 |
90 | Stalker Inc | Satanta, KS 67870 | $22,529 |
91 | Steven V Peterson Revocable Trust | Clay Center, KS 67432 | $21,919 |
92 | Flying S Partnership | Oberlin, KS 67749 | $21,672 |
93 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $21,511 |
94 | Mickey And Steve Ross Partnership | Meade, KS 67864 | $21,492 |
95 | Jeff B Link | Raymond, KS 67573 | $21,397 |
96 | Ils Farm Partnership | Great Bend, KS 67530 | $21,277 |
97 | Roger R Tobias Trust | Lyons, KS 67554 | $21,226 |
98 | Steven D Gunn - Steven D Gunn Rev Trust Dated 1-9- | Superior, NE 68978 | $21,172 |
99 | Seth Gillespie LLC | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $20,832 |
100 | Roger Gillespie LLC | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $20,827 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”