Total Commodity Programs in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 110,954
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $8,655,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Brookover Land Ent Lp | Garden City, KS 67846 | $2,956,637 |
82 | Hammer Farms | Sublette, KS 67877 | $2,939,194 |
83 | Ormiston Farms | Kismet, KS 67859 | $2,931,152 |
84 | Dave & Betty Jean Schields Jv | Goodland, KS 67735 | $2,900,603 |
85 | A M S | Sylvan Grove, KS 67481 | $2,893,689 |
86 | Dj-squared Farms | Goodland, KS 67735 | $2,854,571 |
87 | Dirks Farms | Cimarron, KS 67835 | $2,831,709 |
88 | James And Son Farms | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $2,808,158 |
89 | Penner Partners | Ingalls, KS 67853 | $2,789,763 |
90 | Four B Farms | Scott City, KS 67871 | $2,766,605 |
91 | Heartland Farms | Goodland, KS 67735 | $2,762,513 |
92 | Scott Farms | Johnson, KS 67855 | $2,736,653 |
93 | Six-m Partners | Holcomb, KS 67851 | $2,732,038 |
94 | Lone Tree Farm, Gp | Scott City, KS 67871 | $2,728,308 |
95 | Winsome Farms Gp | Johnson, KS 67855 | $2,720,291 |
96 | Patricia A Lahey | Moscow, KS 67952 | $2,713,798 |
97 | Homestead Farms | Wallace, KS 67761 | $2,710,173 |
98 | Brown Farms | Russell, KS 67665 | $2,703,590 |
99 | Thomas L Lahey | Moscow, KS 67952 | $2,666,199 |
100 | Peter Farms | Tribune, KS 67879 | $2,656,978 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”