Total Commodity Programs in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,332
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $5,888,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Matthew D Dreher | Ludell, KS 67744 | $9,814 |
82 | Kyle-grafel Homestead Trust Grafel | Herndon, KS 67739 | $9,805 |
83 | Beckman Inc | Grinnell, KS 67738 | $9,754 |
84 | Duell Family Farms Gp | Burlington, CO 80807 | $9,644 |
85 | Paul Nelson-nelson Family Trust | Gem, KS 67734 | $9,503 |
86 | Jeff Henderson Farms Inc | Goodland, KS 67735 | $9,473 |
87 | Brian Kling Farms LLC | Goodland, KS 67735 | $9,366 |
88 | Hubbard Brothers LLC | Mc Donald, KS 67745 | $9,266 |
89 | Shawn L Curry | Colby, KS 67701 | $9,228 |
90 | Emco LLC | Goodland, KS 67735 | $9,058 |
91 | Pochop Farm And Ranch LLC | Atwood, KS 67730 | $9,035 |
92 | Grant E Glad Trust No 1 | Atwood, KS 67730 | $9,012 |
93 | Lynn Query | Bird City, KS 67731 | $8,971 |
94 | A S Cahoj Farms | Atwood, KS 67730 | $8,634 |
95 | Don Marshall Seeds Inc | Mc Donald, KS 67745 | $8,630 |
96 | Wilstine G P | Leoti, KS 67861 | $8,583 |
97 | , | $8,383 | |
98 | Smith Family Farms Partnership | Bird City, KS 67731 | $8,272 |
99 | Helen E Burnett | Santa Fe, NM 87507 | $8,088 |
100 | Zachary L Frederick | Alden, KS 67512 | $8,025 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”