Conservation Reserve Program in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 45,791
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $1,888,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Eberhart And Eberhart | Buena Vista, CO 81211 | $793,188 |
102 | Udell Lofland Rev Trust | Liberal, KS 67901 | $791,895 |
103 | Doyle Lippert Rev Inter Vivos Trust | Bison, KS 67520 | $787,876 |
104 | Gamar LLC | Gove, KS 67736 | $785,921 |
105 | Bunnell Farms Co | Coldwater, KS 67029 | $785,383 |
106 | Smoky Y Ranch Inc | Oakley, KS 67748 | $781,461 |
107 | Triple F Farms Inc | Sharon Springs, KS 67758 | $781,287 |
108 | George E Atwood | Elkhart, KS 67950 | $780,163 |
109 | Velma Klassen Rev Trust | Kendall, KS 67857 | $778,811 |
110 | Sherry Scott | Georgetown, TX 78628 | $777,297 |
111 | Rodney Ross | Almena, KS 67622 | $776,716 |
112 | Carl Utz | Liberal, KS 67901 | $776,638 |
113 | Abner Delay | Elkhart, KS 67950 | $774,908 |
114 | Ronald Mellard | Spring Hill, KS 66083 | $773,497 |
115 | W H Robertson | Tribune, KS 67879 | $772,000 |
116 | Steven R Baumrucker | Hays, KS 67601 | $771,895 |
117 | Don R Dunn | Richfield, KS 67953 | $766,412 |
118 | Beachner Southwest Farming Co | Saint Paul, KS 66771 | $763,647 |
119 | Winger & Sons | Johnson, KS 67855 | $756,867 |
120 | Denny E Helvey | Salina, KS 67401 | $755,914 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”