Total Emergency Relief Program in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 10,241
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $104,226,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | , | $116,352 | |
102 | A S Partnership | Rexford, KS 67753 | $116,168 |
103 | , | $115,407 | |
104 | Edwards Farm Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $115,225 |
105 | Andee L Fry | Montezuma, KS 67867 | $114,974 |
106 | Wt Partnership | Bird City, KS 67731 | $114,932 |
107 | Neil D Young | Tribune, KS 67879 | $112,867 |
108 | Scott Foote | Hoxie, KS 67740 | $112,842 |
109 | Mcclain Farms LLC | Almena, KS 67622 | $112,362 |
110 | Southwest Family Farms | Plains, KS 67869 | $111,582 |
111 | Perry Keller | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $111,344 |
112 | Jb Farms Inc | Monument, CO 80132 | $111,111 |
113 | Lankas Farms | Atwood, KS 67730 | $110,948 |
114 | Haremza Farms | Colby, KS 67701 | $110,916 |
115 | Sos Farms LLC | Hoxie, KS 67740 | $110,616 |
116 | Wheatbelt Farms Inc | Tribune, KS 67879 | $110,358 |
117 | Rev Iv Trust Of Jeanne Wilson | Colby, KS 67701 | $109,826 |
118 | Kent & Joan Banister Partnership | Mc Donald, KS 67745 | $109,405 |
119 | Green Acre Farms Inc | Deerfield, KS 67838 | $108,873 |
120 | Graham Farms | Deerfield, KS 67838 | $108,730 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”