Conservation Reserve Program in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 45,791

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $1,888,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
121Terry R EsfeldGreat Bend, KS 67530$751,574
122Eaton AssociatesJay Em, WY 82219$750,999
123J & L Smith Farms IncUlysses, KS 67880$748,884
124A & J Farms IncJohnson, KS 67855$748,789
125James E BeougherGove, KS 67736$748,598
126David L JanitellSharon Springs, KS 67758$747,963
127Pfeifer Living TrustHays, KS 67601$738,237
128John Grubb Rev TrTribune, KS 67879$736,526
129Lottinville Farms IncSaint Anne, IL 60964$734,071
130Richard F LottinvilleSaint Anne, IL 60964$733,955
131Sidebottom Homestead IncHolly, CO 81047$733,482
132John D MullerPlano, TX 75023$732,851
133Wayne MillerDeerfield, KS 67838$731,333
134Dan C Sullivan TrustUlysses, KS 67880$730,000
135Paul YostMontezuma, KS 67867$729,296
136Gary T HowardUlysses, KS 67880$728,888
137Edward- Wiatt Revoca E WiattLas Cruces, NM 88001$726,036
138Ksj Farms LLCPlainville, KS 67663$725,753
139Debra K ThomasFowler, KS 67844$723,611
140Mitchell-bock Revocable Trust BockGarden City, KS 67846$723,554

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag