Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 6,204
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $19,325,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Hanson Ranch Inc | Wallace, KS 67761 | $20,132 |
122 | Joel Miller | Scott City, KS 67871 | $20,056 |
123 | Gene Chrisler | Natoma, KS 67651 | $19,913 |
124 | James Theron Culwell Trust No 1 | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $19,911 |
125 | Eliott And Sue Glad L P | Atwood, KS 67730 | $19,903 |
126 | Tyler J Hills | Colby, KS 67701 | $19,833 |
127 | Robbins Family Farm LLC | Paradise, KS 67658 | $19,831 |
128 | , | $19,777 | |
129 | Edward J Weigel II | Russell, KS 67665 | $19,711 |
130 | Jason P. Zerr | Grainfield, KS 67737 | $19,567 |
131 | Jan Wilkinson | Scott City, KS 67871 | $19,566 |
132 | Tony Chrisler | Natoma, KS 67651 | $19,525 |
133 | Hipp Farms LLC | Claflin, KS 67525 | $19,397 |
134 | Jeff Johnson | Utica, KS 67584 | $19,268 |
135 | Shawn K Meairs | Fowler, KS 67844 | $19,242 |
136 | Mark L Carter | Jennings, KS 67643 | $19,218 |
137 | Libby Schneider | Logan, KS 67646 | $19,077 |
138 | , | $18,987 | |
139 | Aaron Plunkett | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $18,777 |
140 | Lonnie D Wilson | Colby, KS 67701 | $18,575 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”