Total Commodity Programs in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 110,954

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $8,655,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2023
121Kansas Univ Endow AssociationHutchinson, KS 67504$2,437,677
122Posterity PartnershipPlains, KS 67869$2,436,803
123Allied Family FarmColby, KS 67701$2,421,562
124Bruce A & Kelly J Livengood JvKanorado, KS 67741$2,419,748
125Timothy D & Connie D Livengood JvGoodland, KS 67735$2,389,606
126Triangle HGarden City, KS 67846$2,385,096
127Renick / ReynoldsIngalls, KS 67853$2,383,123
128Bachand Farms IncClyde, KS 66938$2,379,317
129C & S FarmsScott City, KS 67871$2,363,293
130Ash Grove FarmsScott City, KS 67871$2,362,709
131J & L Smith Farms IncUlysses, KS 67880$2,361,416
132Childs Farms PtrBelleville, KS 66935$2,361,140
133W & K Schmidt FarmsRolla, KS 67954$2,347,445
134Rnr Farms LLCConcordia, KS 66901$2,345,241
135Light FarmsRolla, KS 67954$2,331,713
136TriagEllinwood, KS 67526$2,323,192
137Willard W Miller Jr TrustColby, KS 67701$2,314,399
138Coberly Partnership Mark SGove, KS 67736$2,296,446
139Doll Farms IncGarden City, KS 67846$2,286,754
140M & M Farms PartnershipGarden City, KS 67846$2,263,136

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag