Non-insured Disaster Assistance in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 343
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $1,685,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Keenan C Frownfelter | Elkhart, KS 67950 | $3,790 |
142 | Tyrel Nilhas | Ellis, KS 67637 | $3,772 |
143 | Toby L Lohman-fuller | Lakin, KS 67860 | $3,659 |
144 | Darline Stramel - Darline K Stramel Trust | Winona, KS 67764 | $3,615 |
145 | Schertz Cattle Co | Monument, KS 67747 | $3,591 |
146 | , | $3,590 | |
147 | Hoskinson Cattle Company Inc | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $3,583 |
148 | Bernard J Schieferecke | Hoxie, KS 67740 | $3,564 |
149 | Zachary N Luedke | Russell Springs, KS 67764 | $3,548 |
150 | Fritzler & Sons Ranch Inc | Ness City, KS 67560 | $3,491 |
151 | Wade Tucker | Johnson, KS 67855 | $3,420 |
152 | Mulder Farms Inc | Logan, KS 67646 | $3,410 |
153 | Randall K Scheuerman | Scott City, KS 67871 | $3,371 |
154 | , | $3,335 | |
155 | Rusty C Clinesmith | Rolla, KS 67954 | $3,326 |
156 | Steve A Berning | Lakin, KS 67860 | $3,318 |
157 | Urban Farms And Cattle Inc | Atwood, KS 67730 | $3,308 |
158 | Larry Dunn | Elkhart, KS 67950 | $3,230 |
159 | , | $3,195 | |
160 | John M Tucker | Elkhart, KS 67950 | $3,190 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”