Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 39,725

Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $662,719,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program
1995-2023
141Bellamy FarmsColby, KS 67701$310,629
142Redd Farms PartnershipSublette, KS 67877$308,008
143Verdell Young & SonTribune, KS 67879$306,321
144Hull Equipment IncHugoton, KS 67951$304,116
145Brent WoodsPlains, KS 67869$302,801
146Rnr Farms LLCConcordia, KS 66901$301,995
147Light FarmsRolla, KS 67954$300,314
148Neal - Rush Family T Davon RushBrewster, KS 67732$299,908
149John Smith-john D & Carolyn K Smith Liv TrustJohnson, KS 67855$298,586
150Kriss Young Trust 1Weskan, KS 67762$297,703
151Barry HittleHugoton, KS 67951$295,961
152Douglas B FoxPlains, KS 67869$293,782
153Steve Harper Farms IncHugoton, KS 67951$291,968
154Brandon HushPlains, KS 67869$289,340
155Kopper Family FarmsCimarron, KS 67835$289,240
156Ritchie K Tarn - Ritchie K Tarn Rev TrustSolomon, KS 67480$289,183
157Suncure FarmsBurlington, CO 80807$288,246
158Verlyn D YostMontezuma, KS 67867$287,267
159Seyb Farm PartnershipJohnson, KS 67855$285,676
160West Acres GrainUlysses, KS 67880$285,469

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag