Conservation Reserve Program in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 45,791

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $1,888,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
141Carrie Nichols TrustMontezuma, KS 67867$722,212
142Danny- Danny Martin MartinRamona, OK 74061$718,168
143Pam KitchGreat Bend, KS 67530$717,612
144Ronald Gary Warden ILiberal, KS 67901$716,533
145Mid America Cattle CoHugoton, KS 67951$716,298
146Fritzler & Sons Ranch IncNess City, KS 67560$716,046
147White Enterprises IncLakin, KS 67860$714,622
148Clark HouckSyracuse, KS 67878$714,166
149Lynn JohnsonCopeland, KS 67837$713,012
150Beauford W WilkersonManter, KS 67862$711,011
151Gene ChrislerNatoma, KS 67651$710,250
152Robert A DunnSyracuse, KS 67878$708,679
153Forrest H Nelson TrustAlva, OK 73717$708,326
154Jon- Jon S Wheat Tru S WheatKearney, NE 68845$706,965
155Tap Farm IncSyracuse, KS 67878$705,988
156Bill Hittle TrustHugoton, KS 67951$703,481
157Ed & Joann Tyler TrBlanchard, OK 73010$702,850
158Marty ElwellMontezuma, KS 67867$699,507
159Clinton L Stalker JrSatanta, KS 67870$698,249
160Rex D AlbinQuinter, KS 67752$693,868

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag