Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 162
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $806,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Sara F Metcalf Rev Trust | Liberal, KS 67901 | $283 |
142 | Robert C Karnes - Karnes Family Trust | Leawood, KS 66206 | $246 |
143 | Sharry - Sharry Sue Turner Trust - Turner | Arkansas City, KS 67005 | $240 |
144 | Corwin Irr Trust Merlin E | Hays, KS 67601 | $225 |
145 | Muirhead Farms Inc | Oberlin, KS 67749 | $220 |
146 | Jodie Lynn Munk | Menlo, KS 67753 | $216 |
147 | Wurm Girls' Farm LLC | Oberlin, KS 67749 | $196 |
148 | Domsch Family Part | Atwood, KS 67730 | $187 |
149 | Joyce A Corwin Rvoc Tr | Hays, KS 67601 | $180 |
150 | Tom Campbell | Hoxie, KS 67740 | $176 |
151 | Jennifer A Wallace | Moro, IL 62067 | $161 |
152 | Ann Rich | Holland, KY 42153 | $161 |
153 | Michael R Trgovich | Wood River, IL 62095 | $161 |
154 | Kathleen M O'neal Family Lp | Colby, KS 67701 | $160 |
155 | Cedar Hill Farm Of Clay County In | Basehor, KS 66007 | $155 |
156 | Mab Irr Trust | Lenexa, KS 66220 | $124 |
157 | David H Toft | El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 | $102 |
158 | Virgil W Jansen Estate | Millstadt, IL 62260 | $40 |
159 | Connie Paronto | Clay Center, KS 67432 | $28 |
160 | Dougherty Gillan Farm | Garden City, KS 67846 | $5 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”