Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 355
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $447,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Rkj Kalmer | Germantown, IL 62245 | $582 |
142 | Doll Family Farm LLC | Golden, CO 80401 | $576 |
143 | Chaffin Investments Inc | Dodge City, KS 67801 | $562 |
144 | Don L Miller | Geneseo, KS 67444 | $562 |
145 | Chris L Wolfe | Minneapolis, KS 67467 | $558 |
146 | E-f LLC | Beaver, OK 73932 | $549 |
147 | , | $546 | |
148 | Jones Farm Partnership | Bellevue, NE 68123 | $524 |
149 | Janice G Dunavan | Pawnee Rock, KS 67567 | $517 |
150 | Charles C Beamer | Oakley, KS 67748 | $512 |
151 | Deborah Buchanan | Fort Mill, SC 29715 | $509 |
152 | Ralph Bane Jr | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $504 |
153 | Fitzgerald Brothers | Liberal, KS 67901 | $492 |
154 | Domsch Family Part | Atwood, KS 67730 | $476 |
155 | Kevin Lynn Slemp | Moscow, KS 67952 | $472 |
156 | Misty Dahn Slemp | Moscow, KS 67952 | $472 |
157 | Great Am Land Dba Great Am Investments Lp | Rolla, KS 67954 | $466 |
158 | Trevor Jon Cox | Clay Center, KS 67432 | $465 |
159 | Doris Stowell | Long Beach, CA 90803 | $451 |
160 | Robert - And Clare Dorsch Family Trust - L Dorsch | Mesa, AZ 85210 | $443 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”