Total Commodity Programs in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 110,954

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $8,655,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2023
161Mclain PartnershipSublette, KS 67877$2,084,514
162Shamburg FarmsGlen Elder, KS 67446$2,081,996
163H & H Farms IncColby, KS 67701$2,081,606
164Levin Farms IncKensington, KS 66951$2,078,641
165M S Grain IncGarden City, KS 67846$2,078,579
166Anthony BleumerIngalls, KS 67853$2,067,267
167Rooney FarmsLakin, KS 67860$2,066,257
168West Acres GrainUlysses, KS 67880$2,061,333
1693-h's EnterprisesColby, KS 67701$2,054,011
170Daniel Lewis SchultzGrainfield, KS 67737$2,052,938
171Gayla M SchubertLyons, KS 67554$2,049,593
172Turner Farms PartnershipGreat Bend, KS 67530$2,049,074
173H & H FarmsScott City, KS 67871$2,031,518
174Jerry Mcreynolds-jerry C Mcreynolds Trust No 1Woodston, KS 67675$2,031,090
175Gary & Kornelia Schields JvGoodland, KS 67735$2,028,011
176Western Production CompanyJohnson, KS 67855$2,021,796
1773-d FarmsEdson, KS 67733$2,019,369
178Schmidt PartnershipSmith Center, KS 66967$2,017,058
179Alfalfa FarmLakin, KS 67860$2,016,943
180Oleo RanchTribune, KS 67879$2,016,672

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag