Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 41
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $12,420 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Patricia A Lahey | Moscow, KS 67952 | $165 |
22 | Thomas L Lahey | Moscow, KS 67952 | $165 |
23 | Roger Gillespie LLC | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $165 |
24 | Seth Gillespie LLC | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $165 |
25 | Donna M Brower | Derby, KS 67037 | $157 |
26 | John L Brower Living Trust - John L Brower | Derby, KS 67037 | $157 |
27 | Sterling Heritage Farms LLC | Sterling, KS 67579 | $154 |
28 | Mike Gaskill | Summerfield, FL 34491 | $148 |
29 | Donald L Birchenough Trust | Wichita, KS 67212 | $136 |
30 | Jolene Gatton Snell Trust | Ellinwood, KS 67526 | $109 |
31 | Cameron C Coleman | Chase, KS 67524 | $109 |
32 | Margaret Roberta Muth Rev Trust | Derby, KS 67037 | $95 |
33 | Jerry H Cox | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $85 |
34 | Cheryl Cox | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $85 |
35 | Philip T Nelson | Windom, KS 67491 | $81 |
36 | Gene Allen Rugan | Ellinwood, KS 67526 | $65 |
37 | Ronald G Rugan Trust | Ellinwood, KS 67526 | $65 |
38 | Galen D Deutsch - Galen & Stacey Deutsch Rev Trust | Chase, KS 67524 | $61 |
39 | We Be Farming LLC | Abilene, TX 79606 | $43 |
40 | Verlyn L Nelson | Windom, KS 67491 | $38 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”