Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 28,765

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $569,975,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
21Cow Camp IncRamona, KS 67475$543,126
22F & J FarmsGoodland, KS 67735$533,254
23F D K PartnershipRexford, KS 67753$527,370
24Henry Pork, LLCLongford, KS 67458$522,905
25R & P Cattle JvCimarron, KS 67835$510,086
26Ihrig Farms GpGoodland, KS 67735$509,536
27Love & Love FarmsMontezuma, KS 67867$501,930
28Hilker Family Limited PartnershipCimarron, KS 67835$500,101
29Doll Land And Cattle IncIngalls, KS 67853$500,000
30Eastside Dairy II LLCJohnson, KS 67855$500,000
31R C Geven Farms LLCSyracuse, KS 67878$500,000
32Carpenter Cattle Co IncBrewster, KS 67732$500,000
33Kohman Dairy LLCSyracuse, KS 67878$500,000
34Reynolds & Reynolds Cattle LLCAbilene, KS 67410$500,000
35Livestock Services IncGreat Bend, KS 67530$500,000
36B2cRexford, KS 67753$493,428
37Hamlin Farms PartnershipHugoton, KS 67951$493,201
38Circle P FarmsWeskan, KS 67762$493,118
39Hendricks Bros PartnershipBird City, KS 67731$492,093
40G & T Farms PartnershipHugoton, KS 67951$489,052

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag