Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 29,092
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $531,371,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Lone Tree Farm, Gp | Scott City, KS 67871 | $502,871 |
22 | Double Diamond Ag | Johnson, KS 67855 | $500,000 |
23 | 4-d Farms | Moscow, KS 67952 | $488,871 |
24 | Rome Farms | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $461,939 |
25 | Clawson Ranch Partnership | Plains, KS 67869 | $449,101 |
26 | Hamilton Brothers | Ensign, KS 67841 | $441,030 |
27 | Southwest Family Farms | Plains, KS 67869 | $438,847 |
28 | Tip Off Farms | Scott City, KS 67871 | $438,272 |
29 | Circle P Farms | Weskan, KS 67762 | $433,633 |
30 | Bryant Farms | Copeland, KS 67837 | $417,192 |
31 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $416,873 |
32 | Love & Love Farms | Montezuma, KS 67867 | $411,188 |
33 | F D K Partnership | Rexford, KS 67753 | $399,042 |
34 | Brown Enterprises | Sublette, KS 67877 | $395,245 |
35 | C-l Farms | Johnson, KS 67855 | $394,961 |
36 | Sterling Farms | Garden City, KS 67846 | $391,831 |
37 | Schmidt Partnership | Smith Center, KS 66967 | $390,743 |
38 | Mark Cavenee Farms Jv | Tribune, KS 67879 | $390,082 |
39 | Double H Farms Ptnshp | Dodge City, KS 67801 | $389,774 |
40 | Doll Partnership | Ingalls, KS 67853 | $384,948 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”