Total Conservation Programs in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 2020

Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 12,121

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $53,289,000 in in 2020.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
2020
61Pam KitchGreat Bend, KS 67530$44,309
62Ronald G Degarmo TrustRolla, KS 67954$44,278
63Winger Cattle Co IncJohnson, KS 67855$44,134
64Carl G Wenger And Deola A Wenger Rev Joint TrHesston, KS 67062$44,133
65Graham FarmsDeerfield, KS 67838$44,044
66John S StandleyGarden City, KS 67846$44,021
67Carl E Kohlhorst IncSyracuse, KS 67878$43,748
68Sara Mcfarland TrustCimarron, KS 67835$43,653
69Greta McfarlandChanute, KS 66720$43,384
70Huff & Puff Pork LLCDeerfield, KS 67838$43,239
71David Bozone Living Tr Dated 2/19/2001Wamego, KS 66547$43,056
72Patricia P Mcfarland TrustCimarron, KS 67835$42,998
73Jerald WartmanIngalls, KS 67853$42,998
74Trifecta Farms IncLakin, KS 67860$42,829
75Linda D JacksonGuymon, OK 73942$42,649
76Southwest Family FarmsPlains, KS 67869$42,416
77Judy K HaslettHaysville, KS 67060$42,347
78Irl And Ruth Brassfield TrustBogue, KS 67625$42,255
79Shafer Family Farms LLCHorseshoe Bay, TX 78657$42,242
80William Greg HolstedMeade, KS 67864$42,188

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag