Total Commodity Programs in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 33,484
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $641,693,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Lewis Wheeler & Lee Wheeler L & L Farms | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $600,265 |
22 | James And Son Farms | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $598,950 |
23 | Hamilton Brothers | Ensign, KS 67841 | $567,448 |
24 | Dirks Farms | Cimarron, KS 67835 | $559,520 |
25 | Stewart And Roshel Stabel Jv | Lakin, KS 67860 | $543,384 |
26 | 4-d Farms | Moscow, KS 67952 | $542,479 |
27 | Tip Off Farms | Scott City, KS 67871 | $538,109 |
28 | C-l Farms | Johnson, KS 67855 | $537,321 |
29 | Circle P Farms | Weskan, KS 67762 | $519,506 |
30 | Clawson Ranch Partnership | Plains, KS 67869 | $518,461 |
31 | Southwest Family Farms | Plains, KS 67869 | $515,271 |
32 | Security State Bank ** | Scott City, KS 67871 | $485,855 |
33 | Doll Partnership | Ingalls, KS 67853 | $485,787 |
34 | Bryant Farms | Copeland, KS 67837 | $473,295 |
35 | Winsome Farms Gp | Johnson, KS 67855 | $469,531 |
36 | Four B Farms | Scott City, KS 67871 | $467,975 |
37 | Brown Enterprises | Sublette, KS 67877 | $466,585 |
38 | Double H Farms Ptnshp | Dodge City, KS 67801 | $461,143 |
39 | E&d Farms | Marienthal, KS 67863 | $458,261 |
40 | Sterling Farms | Garden City, KS 67846 | $457,170 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”