Total Commodity Programs in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 2020
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 35,746
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $965,855,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Kopper Family Farms | Cimarron, KS 67835 | $792,519 |
42 | J P Sons LLC | Dorrance, KS 67634 | $784,388 |
43 | Love & Love Farms | Montezuma, KS 67867 | $783,739 |
44 | Celtic LLC | Tribune, KS 67879 | $779,020 |
45 | Southwest Family Farms | Plains, KS 67869 | $778,435 |
46 | Deerfield Dairy LLC | Deerfield, KS 67838 | $777,799 |
47 | Rome Farms | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $774,293 |
48 | Hendricks Bros Partnership | Bird City, KS 67731 | $772,028 |
49 | F & J Farms | Goodland, KS 67735 | $763,157 |
50 | Smith Brothers Feeders LLC | Richfield, KS 67953 | $761,849 |
51 | Homestead Farms | Wallace, KS 67761 | $749,980 |
52 | F D K Partnership | Rexford, KS 67753 | $737,160 |
53 | Alfalfa Farms | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $727,423 |
54 | Kan Sun Cattle LLC | Leoti, KS 67861 | $724,767 |
55 | Dry Lake Farms | Scott City, KS 67871 | $723,885 |
56 | Lewis Wheeler & Lee Wheeler L & L Farms | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $716,639 |
57 | Reeve Cattle Entities LLC | Garden City, KS 67846 | $712,958 |
58 | Cross Bell Farms | Deerfield, KS 67838 | $709,313 |
59 | Hamilton Brothers | Ensign, KS 67841 | $694,508 |
60 | Stewart And Roshel Stabel Jv | Lakin, KS 67860 | $691,149 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”