Total Conservation Programs in 2nd District of Kansas (Rep. Steve Watkins), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 8,980

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 2nd District of Kansas (Rep. Steve Watkins) totaled $197,680,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2023
21Timothy R BeckerLancaster, KS 66041$402,018
22Vern A KurthElsmore, KS 66732$385,124
23Doyle E DerrickWathena, KS 66090$379,814
24Alfred E And Virginia E Manners LParsons, KS 67357$374,243
25Byers FarmMound City, MO 64470$371,664
26Jesse T RandallMound City, KS 66056$369,744
27Walter W ClarkOskaloosa, KS 66066$353,603
28Rickey L HladkyBerryton, KS 66409$353,325
29Lyle ShattuckPrescott, KS 66767$347,021
30Victor ClarkCenterville, KS 66014$341,427
31Marihta Gobl RutherfordArma, KS 66712$340,527
32Laipple Farms IncWathena, KS 66090$339,382
33Gerald E Pierce JrDenton, KS 66017$337,074
34Olive BrungardtErie, KS 66733$331,407
35Dale AveryPleasanton, KS 66075$323,318
36Mitchell Family Trust 12-14-99Blue Mound, KS 66010$320,524
37Bahr Brothers Farm PtrshipGermantown, WI 53022$314,523
38P Kent SymnsAtchison, KS 66002$313,133
39Edward I Clare JrMeriden, KS 66512$310,262
40Eldon T Johnston Jr Revocable Trust AgreementSebastian, FL 32958$309,847

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag